User:  Benny Hernandez
User Role:  District


2011-2012 District Status Detail

Name: LA PRYOR ISD(254902)
Publication Level 1: 6/21/2013 3:05:18 PM
Status: Passed Publication Level 2: 9/12/2013 6:29:59 PM
Rating: Superior Achievement Last Updated: 9/12/2013 6:29:59 PM
Indicators Answered YES: 18 Indicators Answered NO: 2
District Score: 69 Passing Score: 52
#Indicator DescriptionUpdatedScore
1 Was The Total Fund Balance Less Nonspendable and Restricted Fund Balance Greater Than Zero In The General Fund? 4/26/2013 6:19:19 PMYes
2 Was the Total Unrestricted Net Asset Balance (Net of Accretion of Interest on Capital Appreciation Bonds) In the Governmental Activities Column in the Statement of Net Assets Greater than Zero? (If the District's 5 Year % Change in Students was 10% more) 4/26/2013 6:19:19 PMYes
3 Were There No Disclosures In The Annual Financial Report And/Or Other Sources Of Information Concerning Default On Bonded Indebtedness Obligations? 4/26/2013 6:19:19 PMYes
4 Was The Annual Financial Report Filed Within One Month After November 27th or January 28th Deadline Depending Upon The District's Fiscal Year End Date (June 30th or August 31st)? 4/26/2013 6:19:20 PMYes
5 Was There An Unqualified Opinion in Annual Financial Report? 4/26/2013 6:19:20 PMYes
6 Did The Annual Financial Report Not Disclose Any Instance(s) Of Material Weaknesses In Internal Controls? 4/26/2013 6:19:20 PMNo
   1 Multiplier Sum
7 Was The Three-Year Average Percent Of Total Tax Collections (Including Delinquent) Greater Than 98%? 4/26/2013 6:19:21 PM5
8 Did The Comparison Of PEIMS Data To Like Information In Annual Financial Report Result In An Aggregate Variance Of Less Than 3 Percent Of Expenditures Per Fund Type (Data Quality Measure)? 9/12/2013 6:00:51 PM5
9 Were Debt Related Expenditures (Net Of IFA And/Or EDA Allotment) < $350.00 Per Student? (If The District's Five-Year Percent Change In Students = Or > 7%, Or If Property Taxes Collected Per Penny Of Tax Effort > $200,000 Per Student) 4/26/2013 6:19:21 PM4
10 Was There No Disclosure In The Annual Audit Report Of Material Noncompliance? 4/26/2013 6:19:21 PM5
11 Did The District Have Full Accreditation Status In Relation To Financial Management Practices? (e.g. No Conservator Or Monitor Assigned) 4/26/2013 6:19:22 PM5
12 Was The Aggregate Of Budgeted Expenditures And Other Uses Less Than The Aggregate Of Total Revenues, Other Resources and Fund Balance In General Fund? 4/26/2013 6:19:22 PM5
13 If The District's Aggregate Fund Balance In The General Fund And Capital Projects Fund Was Less Than Zero, Were Construction Projects Adequately Financed? (To Avoid Creating Or Adding To The Fund Balance Deficit Situation) 4/26/2013 6:19:22 PM5
14 Was The Ratio Of Cash And Investments To Deferred Revenues (Excluding Amount Equal To Net Delinquent Taxes Receivable) In The General Fund Greater Than Or Equal To 1:1? (If Deferred Revenues Are Less Than Net Delinquent Taxes Receivable) 4/26/2013 6:19:23 PM5
15 Was The Administrative Cost Ratio Less Than The Threshold Ratio? 4/26/2013 6:19:23 PM5
16 Was The Ratio Of Students To Teachers Within the Ranges Shown Below According To District Size? 4/26/2013 6:19:23 PM5
17 Was The Ratio Of Students To Total Staff Within the Ranges Shown Below According To District Size? 4/26/2013 6:19:23 PM5
18 Was The Decrease In Undesignated Unreserved Fund Balance < 20% Over Two Fiscal Years?(If Total Revenues > Operating Expenditures In The General Fund,Then District Receives 5 Points) 4/26/2013 6:19:24 PM5
19 Was The Aggregate Total Of Cash And Investments In The General Fund More Than $0? 4/26/2013 6:19:24 PM5
20 Were Investment Earnings In All Funds (Excluding Debt Service Fund and Capital Projects Fund) Meet or Exceed the 3-Month Treasury Bill Rate? 4/26/2013 6:19:24 PM5
   69 Weighted Sum
   1 Multiplier Sum
   69 Score

Determination Of Rating

A. Did The District Answer 'No' To Indicators 1, 2, 3 Or 4?   OR   Did The District Answer 'No' To Both 5 and 6?   If So, The District’s Rating Is Substandard Achievement.
B. Determine Rating By Applicable Range For summation of the indicator scores (Indicators 7-20)
Superior Achievement 64-70
Above Standard Achievement 58-63
Standard Achievement 52-57
Substandard Achievement <52

Indicator 16 & 17 Ratios

Indicator 16 Ranges for Ratios   Indicator 17 Ranges for Ratios
District Size - Number of Students Between Low High District Size - Number of Students Between Low High
< 500 7 22 < 500 5 14
500-999 10 22 500-999 5.8 14
1000-4999 11.5 22 1000-4999 6.3 14
5000-9999 13 22 5000-9999 6.8 14
=> 10000 13.5 22 => 10000 7.0 14

Audit Home Page: School Financial Audits | Send comments or suggestions to schoolaudits@tea.state.tx.us
The Texas Education Agency
1701 North Congress Avenue · Austin, Texas, 78701 · (512) 463-9734